[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-08-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96cc09dea48b562a0fc93d43fb3b702ac20b89fd commit r14-802-g96cc09dea48b562a0fc93d43fb3b702ac20b89fd Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: F

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf3b032b8fb681516ccacbe3689f1cad43a1773a commit r14-801-gcf3b032b8fb681516ccacbe3689f1cad43a1773a Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: F

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 55024 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55024&action=edit An enhanced test case This test case from Herald illustrates a variety of combinations. Giving: $ gfc -std=

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d46b3db4bd016a3eccfb933c81c7a9d87c0ad403 commit r14-566-gd46b3db4bd016a3eccfb933c81c7a9d87c0ad403 Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: S

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-07 Thread john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz via Gcc-bugs
ot gnu.org > To: John Harper > Subject: [Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it > Resent-Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 06:36:00 +1200 (NZST) > Resent-From: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 > > --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisl

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-07 Thread john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz via Gcc-bugs
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org >> To: John Harper >> Subject: [Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it >> Resent-Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 06:14:37 +1200 (NZST) >> Resent-From: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 &g

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-07 Thread john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz via Gcc-bugs
-f2003 legacy possibility. John H On Sun, 7 May 2023, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 18:14:23 + > From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org > To: John Harper > Subject: [Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it > Resent-Date: Mon

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-07 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) That recent patch regression tests fine. I should mention, there is one of our original test cases in gfortran.dg that does use a comma. We definitely have see

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-07 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- A additional adjustment to reject the semi-colon always. diff --git a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c index 78bfd9e8787..db3330060ce 100644 --- a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c +++ b/li

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-06 Thread john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz via Gcc-bugs
ubject: [Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it > Resent-Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 02:45:51 +1200 (NZST) > Resent-From: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 > > Jerry DeLisle changed: > > What

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-06 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96d699196285858df5d1484b4443cf849908662f commit r14-541-g96d699196285858df5d1484b4443cf849908662f Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: Fr

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- A side comment. We have a runtime function called "notify_std". Every time I try to use it I struggle as it is not intuitively obvious how it works. We ought to provide some better documentation on using it

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-03 Thread john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz via Gcc-bugs
. You wouldn't then have to change the gfortran manual page. John On Thu, 4 May 2023, John Harper wrote: > Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 16:59:31 +1200 (NZST) > From: John Harper > To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org > Subject: Re: [Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accept

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-03 Thread john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz via Gcc-bugs
> To: John Harper > Subject: [Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it > Resent-Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 15:05:59 +1200 (NZST) > Resent-From: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 > > --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- > Is thi

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-05-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Is this acceptable: $ ./a.out Compiler version = GCC version 14.0.0 20230424 (experimental) Compiler options = -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -Wpedantic -fpre-include=/usr/include/finclude/math-vector-fort

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-04-30 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- I knew this looked familiar. We did it on purpose. From list_read.c: /* A trailing space is required, we give a little latitude here, 10.9.1. */ c = next_char (dtp); if (!is_separator(c) && c != '!

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-04-30 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-04-30 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it

2023-04-28 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109662 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran Last reconfirme