http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23123|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-25 20:53:37
UTC ---
"joel at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> Why cmp.w when it is tst.l?
Because it is smaller.
"joel at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> Why cmp.w when it is tst.l?
Because it is smaller.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #10 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-25
20:42:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> >+#ifdef __rtems__
> >+void rtems_cache_flush_multiple_data_lines( const void *, size_t );
> >+#else
>
> Include the header that declares it.
>
> >+cm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #9 from joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com 2011-01-25 20:34:03 UTC ---
On 01/25/2011 02:06 PM, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
>
> --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-25
> 20:05:54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-25 20:05:54
UTC ---
>+#ifdef __rtems__
>+void rtems_cache_flush_multiple_data_lines( const void *, size_t );
>+#else
Include the header that declares it.
>+ cmp.l #0, %a1
cmp.w#0, %
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-25 19:17:49
UTC ---
The patch looks reasonable to me, though I would like to hear Andreas's
opinion.
Technically this patch should go to the libffi maintainers, as libffi is
maintained in a separate r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23108|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-25 18:15:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The alternative ABI is just slightly different. When using the 68881,
> floating
> point values are returned in %fp0. When not using it, floating point va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-24 21:53:28
UTC ---
I didn't intend to disable them permanently. Just identify them to implement
alternatives.
If the sysv abi cannot be used on 68000, 680x0 w/o HW FP, or at least some
Coldfire, then w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-24 21:36:52
UTC ---
This is the wrong way to fix that. The m68k SYSV ABI requires 68020+ w/
68881/2. If you use a different ABI you should write a proper implementation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-24 21:06:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 23108
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23108
Hacks to disable problem areas
This patch is a hack to conditionally disable the parts of the code w
14 matches
Mail list logo
