--- Comment #8 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-01 21:02
---
Implemented. Hopefully it will be of some use to others :)
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-01 21:00
---
Subject: Bug 31937
Author: andreast
Date: Sat Dec 1 21:00:04 2007
New Revision: 130559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130559
Log:
2007-12-01 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P
--- Comment #6 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-21 22:14
---
Buh, reassigng.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assigned
--- Comment #5 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-21 22:13
---
New patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01128.html
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 19:34
---
The mentioned patch does not work properly, it only handles soft-float when
no-long-double-128 is used.
Working on a better one which should support both, 'double == long double' and
long double == 128.
--
htt
--- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 22:55
---
Patch is posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00286.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31937
--- Comment #2 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-02 22:01
---
Working on support for.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from patrick dot olinet at gmail dot com 2007-05-16 14:23
---
Notice that this bug prevents loading and running java bytecode from a native
code binary compiled with gcj. I guess it relies on libffi to call the methods
of the bytecode.
This java problem is what I've enc
