https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
Bug 64020 depends on bug 64166, which changed state.
Bug 64166 Summary: JIT does not provide a way for verifying dumpfiles from
testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64166
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Dec 9 15:35:39 2014
New Revision: 218521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/64166: Add API entrypoint gcc_jit_context_enable_dump
gcc/jit/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #8 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #7)
> (In reply to dmalcolm from comment #5)
> > (In reply to dmalcolm from comment #4)
> > > Am testing a candidate patch for this
> >
> > Patch posted as:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #7 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #5)
> (In reply to dmalcolm from comment #4)
> > Am testing a candidate patch for this
>
> Patch posted as:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg032
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #6 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 18:23:37 2014
New Revision: 218240
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218240&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/64020: Fixes to handling of builtins
PR jit/64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #5 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #4)
> Am testing a candidate patch for this
Patch posted as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg03229.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> [would it be even better to optimize this to just a sin (2 * theta) ?]
Only with -funsafe-math-optimizations (it's unsafe for large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #2 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For reference, both at -O3, based on r217939:
./cc1 of
#include
int
test_of_builtin_trig (double theta)
{
return 2 * sin (theta) * cos (theta);
}
generates:
test_of_builtin_trig:
.LFB3:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #1 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
builtin_info.decl is NULL for BUILT_IN_CEXPI.
4586static inline bool
4587builtin_decl_implicit_p (enum built_in_function fncode)
4588{
4589 size_t uns_fncode = (size_t)fncode;
4
11 matches
Mail list logo
