[Bug java/25847] libjava build doesn't stop when there is a fatal error

2006-04-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 19:14 --- Always do a make check, this is the correct thing to do when checking the compiler anyways. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug java/25847] libjava build doesn't stop when there is a fatal error

2006-03-31 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 23:30 --- Is there a reasonable way to detect good failures versus bad failures here? We definitely want to ignore cases where gcj-dbtool fails due to things like not having mmap available. Perhaps the thing to do is let it fa

[Bug java/25847] libjava build doesn't stop when there is a fatal error

2006-01-18 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-18 19:14 --- It depends on what kind of failure. This "Segmentation fault" is due to a broken libgcj.so. It makes no senses to continue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25847

[Bug java/25847] libjava build doesn't stop when there is a fatal error

2006-01-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 19:00 --- Lets look: ## We don't actually care if it fails -- if it does, just make an ## empty file. This is simpler than trying to discover when mmap is ## not available. so what is the problem here? This is not really a