--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03
05:34 ---
Forgot to mark as fixed earlier.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03
04:12 ---
I've checked in the fix for this.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03
04:06 ---
Subject: Bug 21722
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-03 04:06:19
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog class.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03
04:06 ---
Subject: Bug 21722
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-03 04:05:53
Modified files:
gcc/java : Change
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01
21:36 ---
I'm testing a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |
--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-06-01 20:59 ---
Yes. I think this is because the compiler needs to see the definition and the
use site
to exhibit this bug. Without the def it will correctly emit the code walking
the table
to get to the member.
--
http://gc
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01
20:30 ---
Interestingly, if I compile the two .class files separately
and then link the results, it works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21722
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23
18:03 ---
Confirmed, I don't get a seg fault but a NPE (NullPointerException) instead.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23
16:59 ---
Related to PR 1259.
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||1
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||skh at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21722
--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-05-23 16:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=8953)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8953&action=view)
tarball showing the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21722
11 matches
Mail list logo