--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-02-10 23:46
---
Verified.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
http
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
14:41 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
14:34 ---
Subject: Bug 19295
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-24 14:34:20
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog jcf-write.c
libjav
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-19 22:44
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] Incorrect bytecode produced
for bitwise AND
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
> 19:24 ---
>
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
22:37 ---
I'm working on this.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
19:24 ---
Mark, can we keep known wrong-code bugs targeted for 4.0 please? Java/Ada
or other languages shouldn't make a difference for wrong code bugs. They
are the most serious kind we have.
--
Wha
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:52 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Keywords||wrong-co
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06
20:00 ---
I've investigated this a little.
The bug does not occur with gcj 3.3 or 3.4, so I am marking
it as a regression.
The trouble starts in fold_single_bit_test(). Here we transform
"tagBits & IsArrayType" into
