https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
Loïc Yhuel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||loic.yhuel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
Andrey Ryabinin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryabinin.a.a at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
--- Comment #2 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> so it fails on purpose (not sure why though). And it ignores always-inline.
> I wonder if we should, for always-inline functions, inline anyway and output
> a war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
