https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 15:17:20 2015
New Revision: 221596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65521
* ipa-icf.c (sem_item::update_hash_by_addr_refs): Ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35105|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, judging from the fact that we print symtab_node::order into the
-fdump-final-insns= dumps:
;; Function selinux_ops (selinux_ops, funcdef_no=4, cgraph_uid=4,
symbol_order=4)
it should be ok (otherwise
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 35105
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35105&action=edit
gcc5-pr65521.patch
This fixes this for me. But I haven't done any in-depth analysis whether the
symtab order f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
struct socket {
int sk;
};
selinux_task_getioprio(struct task_struct *p) {
return current_has_perm(p, 256UL);
}
selinux_task_getscheduler(struct task_struct *p) {
return current_has_perm(p, 256UL)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
