[Bug ipa/64447] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-9.c

2014-12-31 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64447 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/64447] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-9.c

2014-12-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64447 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug ipa/64447] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-9.c

2014-12-30 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64447 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/64447] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-9.c

2014-12-30 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64447 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, the problem is that estimate_function_body_sizes frees ipa_free_all_node_params when called late via add_new_function. the following patch should fix it. Honza Index: ipa-inline-analysis.c ===

[Bug ipa/64447] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-9.c

2014-12-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64447 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug ipa/64447] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-9.c

2014-12-30 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64447 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- Analyzing compilation unit Performing interprocedural optimizations <*free_lang_data> /home/dje/src/src/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/bitmap_allocator.cc: At global scope: /home/dje/src/src/libstdc++-v

[Bug ipa/64447] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-9.c

2014-12-30 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64447 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED