https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to David Brown from comment #7)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> > Can you provide a specific example that you would allow this way?
> >
> >
>
> I'd go back to my original ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 28.06.2022 um 14:53 schrieb david at westcontrol dot com
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
>
> --- Comment #5 from David Brown ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
--- Comment #7 from David Brown ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> > Am 28.06.2022 um 14:53 schrieb david at westcontrol dot com
> > :
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
--- Comment #5 from David Brown ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> (In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #3)
> > There is a more specific instance here: can_inline_edge_by_limits_p in
> > ipa-inline.cc treats flags and "optimize"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #3)
> There is a more specific instance here: can_inline_edge_by_limits_p in
> ipa-inline.cc treats flags and "optimize" attributes differently.
A bit up there's a bla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
See also https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2009-02/msg00408.html which was a
way forward for wrapv but there was not much work on it really since that year.
The work on this has a huge impact to the IR real