--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:30 ---
This column information:
t.c:2:11: note: generated from here
__asm__ ("frob%0" : "+r" (X));
^
I am not going to get into a reopen war with you anyway. I am just trying to
make a list of the diagnostic i
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:18 ---
>The column information is wrong.
What column information :).
>The diagnostic markers are inconsistent (Error versus error).
Report that to the binutils project.
>This depends on the gnu assembler, which is not t
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 16:59 ---
The column information is wrong.
The diagnostic markers are inconsistent (Error versus error).
This depends on the gnu assembler, which is not the default in many places.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 16:49 ---
Now with Apple's as we get the weird error message you pointed out but that is
because apple's as does not support the change in line info we output:
# 2 "t.c" 1
frob%eax
# 0 "" 2
--
pinskia at gcc do
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 16:47 ---
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.18.0.20080103
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44527
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 16:47 ---
Hmm, with a newer binutils we get a better error message:
t.c: Assembler messages:
t.c:2: Error: no such instruction: `frob %eax'
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
