https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39440
--- Comment #5 from David ---
This is a duplicate of 30527.
A subset of the most commonly needed/used modifiers have been added to the docs
as of 5.x (including the %c0 referenced above). For this reason, I recommend
this bug be closed.
If the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39440
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks.
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keyw
--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2009-03-12 18:29 ---
We don't have to document all of the modifiers, but we do have to document some
of them. There are cases where they are required in order to use asm
statements effectively. Most of the modifiers haven't changed for decades, I
--- Comment #2 from etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr 2009-03-12 14:10
---
The thread associated:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-03/msg00288.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39440
--- Comment #1 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-12 13:45 ---
I'm not so sure documenting these is a good idea. Aren't these really internal
implementation details that are accidentally exposed via asm()?
IMHO putting them in the user documentation is risky because it means use
