https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.3 |5.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Unfortunately that patch breaks the build on x86 GNU/Linux. The problem is
that the split-stack support (the __morestack symbol) must be linked into the
shared library directly, not via -lgcc_s. So it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> Normally libgo.so will get the symbol _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData from
> libgcc_s.so. The first step here is to find out why that didn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Normally libgo.so will get the symbol _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData from
libgcc_s.so. The first step here is to find out why that didn't happen. Was
libgo.so not linked against libgcc_s.so? Does libgc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
