[Bug go/59408] [4.9 regression] Many Go tests FAIL with notesleep not on g0

2013-12-09 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59408 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > This problem should be fixed now. Sorry about that. It does for the vast majority of the 32-bit tests. I'll file separate bugs for the few

[Bug go/59408] [4.9 regression] Many Go tests FAIL with notesleep not on g0

2013-12-06 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59408 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/59408] [4.9 regression] Many Go tests FAIL with notesleep not on g0

2013-12-06 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59408 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Dec 6 18:26:27 2013 New Revision: 205756 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205756&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/59408 runtime: Don't require g != m->g0 in sema notesleep.

[Bug go/59408] [4.9 regression] Many Go tests FAIL with notesleep not on g0

2013-12-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59408 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0