https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #29 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jun 13 13:56:14 2014
New Revision: 211640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/52583
runtime: Stop backtrace at a few recognized functi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #28 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-09-06 05:30:05
UTC ---
The log test problems should be fixed again.
If it reappears, please don't add to this PR. This PR is about Solaris
problems. Open a new PR instead. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #27 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-06
05:28:26 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Sep 6 05:28:19 2012
New Revision: 191009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191009
Log:
debug/elf, debug/dwarf: DWARF line number f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #26 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-06
05:28:12 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Sep 6 05:28:02 2012
New Revision: 191008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191008
Log:
debug/elf, debug/dwarf: DWARF line number f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #26 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-06
05:28:12 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Sep 6 05:28:02 2012
New Revision: 191008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191008
Log:
debug/elf, debug/dwarf: DWARF line number f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-26
08:41:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> The problem resurfaced again on alpha [1]:
And on mips64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #24 from Uros Bizjak 2012-08-26 07:53:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > I think that the problems with the log test should be fixed now.
>
> The problem resurfaced again on alpha [1]:
Comment 11 ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #23 from Uros Bizjak 2012-08-26 06:59:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I think that the problems with the log test should be fixed now.
The problem resurfaced again on alpha [1]:
--- FAIL: log.TestAll (0.26 seconds)
:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #22 from Ian Lan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #21 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-04-25 14:56:56
UTC ---
I no longer see any failures on i386 Solaris. I see a few failures on x86_64
Solaris. They are all crashing in x86_64_fallback_frame_state when trying to
unwind through a signal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #20 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-25 06:40:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I think that the problems with the log test should be fixed now.
Yes, my latest libgo testrun on alpha [1] is clean.
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #19 from Ian Lance T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #18 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-25
04:26:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Apr 25 04:26:31 2012
New Revision: 186802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186802
Log:
PR go/52583
net: Solaris fixes.
In pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #17 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-25
04:26:21 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Apr 25 04:26:12 2012
New Revision: 186801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186801
Log:
PR go/52583
net: Solaris fixes.
In pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-04-24 20:43:33
UTC ---
I think that the problems with the log test should be fixed now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-20 13:48:51 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2012-03-16 09:55:26 UTC ---
[...]
> I'm now running into
>
> --- FAIL: net.TestMulticas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-17 17:18:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 26907
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26907
readelf --debug output for patched log/check a.out
Output of readelf --debug on x86_64, patched log/c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-17 16:41:21
UTC ---
Can you attach the output of readelf --debug (not just --debug=line) for the
program that fails?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-17 15:13:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 26906
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26906
Patch to log/log_test.go that witll trigger the failure on x86_64.
(In reply to comment #6)
> The pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-16 11:05:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I'm now running into
>
> --- FAIL: net.TestMulticastListener (0.00 seconds)
> sockoptip.go:118: "224.0.0.254:12345" not found in RIB
>
> still look
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-16 11:03:28 UTC ---
> I'm now running into
>
> --- FAIL: net.TestMulticastListener (0.00 seconds)
> sockoptip.go:118: "224.0.0.254:12345" not found in RIB
>
> still looking wha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-16 09:55:26 UTC ---
I've found that this failure on Solaris
--- FAIL: net.TestMulticastListener (0.00 seconds)
sockoptip.go:67: First ListenMulticastUDP failed: setsockopt: In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-16 08:44:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> The first step is to run readelf --debug=line FILE to make sure that the line
> number information is recorded correctly. Whi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-16 03:18:46
UTC ---
Thanks for looking at this.
The first step is to run readelf --debug=line FILE to make sure that the line
number information is recorded correctly. Which of course it probably is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-15 22:01:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If you look at the test (libgo/go/log/log_test.go), you'll see that it simply
> does
>
> if useFormat {
> Printf("hello %d world", 23)
> } els
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-15 16:23:33
UTC ---
If you look at the test (libgo/go/log/log_test.go), you'll see that it simply
does
if useFormat {
Printf("hello %d world", 23)
} else {
Println("hello", 23,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-15 07:21:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> What's failing is not Printf or Println, but the filename and line number.
> Those are retrieved using DWARF lookup on the PC, and evidently something is
> go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-15 05:27:03
UTC ---
What's failing is not Printf or Println, but the filename and line number.
Those are retrieved using DWARF lookup on the PC, and evidently something is
going wrong in that area. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-14 19:27:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> --- FAIL: log.TestAll (0.02 seconds)
> log_test.go:66: log output should match
> "^.*/[A-Za-z0-9_\\-]+\\.go:(54|56):
> hello 23 world$" is ":0: hello 23
31 matches
Mail list logo
