https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #26)
> (In reply to qinzhao from comment #25)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #24)
> > >
> > > > How about the patch for the above 2? has it been committed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #27 from Qing Zhao ---
> --- Comment #26 from Martin Liška ---
>
>> 2. Intel compiler (icc)'s profmerge is able to merge all the .dyn files
>> under one directory, does gcc have such functionality currently?
>
> We have folder-base
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #26 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #25)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #24)
> >
> > > How about the patch for the above 2? has it been committed?
> >
> > It has been there for a while, please take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #25 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #24)
>
> > How about the patch for the above 2? has it been committed?
>
> It has been there for a while, please take a look at:
>
> $ gcov-tool merge --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #24 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #23)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > Created attachment 27869 [details]
> > Patch for adding merge-gcda
> >
> > here is the patch which adds merge-gcda .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jun 5 12:10:22 2018
New Revision: 261199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261199&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Support variables in expansion of -fprofile-generate option (PR
gcov-prof
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Petr Špaček from comment #19)
> Sure, I would be happy with any version, thank you!
>
> For people who want to generate code coverage reports for parallel
> executions, beware of https://github.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #19 from Petr Špaček ---
Sure, I would be happy with any version, thank you!
For people who want to generate code coverage reports for parallel executions,
beware of https://github.com/linux-test-project/lcov/issues/37.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #17 from Petr Špaček ---
I found this bug while searching for a way to solve exactly this problem, so
for the record: It sounds like very good and useful addition. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 41481
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41481&action=edit
Patch candidate
I'm attaching patch that supports following expansion of -fprofile-dir (or
arguments of -fprofi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-25
08:24:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I think a tool to merge would be a good partial solution.
We will go with the tool solution. I'll take care of the tool before GCC 4.8,
if that's OK with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #11 from Roland Schulz 2012-07-25
00:50:30 UTC ---
Steven wrote that they are not merged but that race conditions occur. That is
also what I observed. To clarify: Message Passing Interface (MPI) is a
parallelization method which execu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-25
00:05:40 UTC ---
> so that different processes don't overwrite each others output files.
They don't overwrite each other, rather they are merged together at write out
time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #9 from Roland Schulz 2012-07-24
23:52:41 UTC ---
I think a tool to merge would be a good partial solution.
As far as I can see what would still be missing for user-friendly usage, is a
mechanism to guarantee that all pre-merged file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-24
23:20:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 27869 [details]
> Patch for adding merge-gcda
I am changing the copyright over to the FSF based on the fact Cavium (Networks)
has a blank
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-24
22:12:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 27869
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27869
Patch for adding merge-gcda
here is the patch which adds merge-gcda . I don't add any testcases as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-22
10:46:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We have one internally at Cavium which is designed to run afterwards and merge
> a few gcda file. It is designed for how we run multi-core programs and wr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-22
10:23:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > A tool to merge multiple gcda files shoulnd't be very difficult to write. I
> > don't think this should be done by the compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-22
07:06:47 UTC ---
-fprofile-dir= is already implemented.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
xunxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-22
00:42:28 UTC ---
We have one internally at Cavium which is designed to run afterwards and merge
a few gcda file. It is designed for how we run multi-core programs and write a
gcda file for each run.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
30 matches
Mail list logo
