https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090
--- Comment #6 from Yang Wang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > do_it() is indeed called 4 times,but I wonder how the coverage statistiscs
> > of the for-statement is calculated. It doesn't become 5 untill the
> > for-stamentmen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090
--- Comment #5 from Yang Wang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > do_it() is indeed called 4 times,but I wonder how the coverage statistiscs
> > of the for-statement is calculated. It doesn't become 5 untill the
> > for-stamentmen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> do_it() is indeed called 4 times,but I wonder how the coverage statistiscs
> of the for-statement is calculated. It doesn't become 5 untill the
> for-stamentment is completed.
We count a line every time th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090
--- Comment #3 from Yang Wang ---
(In reply to Yang Wang from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > No, it's correct as it only contains do_it() call that is triggered the same
> > number times as line 20 minus one.
>
> (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090
--- Comment #2 from Yang Wang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> No, it's correct as it only contains do_it() call that is triggered the same
> number times as line 20 minus one.
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> No, it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
