https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6aa7d45b502c01f8703c8d2cee2690f9aa8e282
commit r13-2382-gb6aa7d45b502c01f8703c8d2cee2690f9aa8e282
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 06:45:25PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Alternatively, simply catching the NULL pointer dereference by
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
> index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 07:57:56PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
>
> --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve Kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)
> The function is match_data_constant(), so we're looking for a
> constant. My patch simply removes the type checking as it is
> unimportant here, and a t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 06:45:25PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
>
> anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
