[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698 commit r8-10521-ge0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698 Author: Tobias Burnus D

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769 commit r9-8921-g0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769 Author: Tobias Burnus Da

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13421890f81844acb134a460eda7132db3e504ed commit r10-8775-g13421890f81844acb134a460eda7132db3e504ed Author: Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c12facd22881517127ebbe213d7ecc7fc1fcea4e commit r11-3259-gc12facd22881517127ebbe213d7ecc7fc1fcea4e Author: Tobias Burnus Date: T

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-09-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-07 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > f951`gfc_resolve_formal_arglist(proc=0x00014301fbb0) at resolve.c:313:18 > frame #2: 0x0001000eb283 Setting a breakpoint here and i

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Reduced test (provided t.mod exists) submodule (t) ts contains module procedure bp(s) ! end procedure bp end submodule ts end pr93423_red.f90:5:19: 5 | module procedure bp(s) |

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-06 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- On x86_64 I never reach symbol.c:2662, since the code returns from line 2659. This the closest I get to your backtrace: Breakpoint 2, free_st_labels (label=0x0) at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/fortran/symb

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-06 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer --- It hits that breakpoints many times and for the first many it was always 0. Then I just let it run until it ICEd and backed up the call stack a bit. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-04 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > From several runs > > frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f951`gfc_free_namespace(gfc_namespace*) > [inlined] free_uop_tree(uop_tree=0x000

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-04 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >From several runs frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f951`gfc_free_namespace(gfc_namespace*) [inlined] free_uop_tree(uop_tree=0x00ce) at symbol.c:3881:17 frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f9

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-03 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #0) > f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > 0x10be671b crash_signal > /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/toplev.c:328 > 0x103a6484 free_st_l

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

2020-07-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0