[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2019-08-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 Bug 87994 depends on bug 87993, which changed state. Bug 87993 Summary: ICE in gfc_constructor_first, at fortran/constructor.c:234 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-12-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have instrumented gfortran with the patch in comment 5 and all the tests fail as with pr87881: = ==67715==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: hea

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-14 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > AFAICT the patch in comment 5 fixes the tests in comments 1 and 5, but not > the test in comment 0. % cat a.f90 program p real :: a, b dat

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT the patch in comment 5 fixes the tests in comments 1 and 5, but not the test in comment 0.

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-14 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-14 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #4 from kargl a

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-13 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- Sure ...

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to/duplicate of pr87881/pr87945/pr87993. > Changed between 20181028 and 20181104 (ICE). Parameter inquiry has been introduced at revision r265729: before it gave the error Error: Unexpected

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

2018-11-12 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- > Should be valid code, ... Whoops, suboptimal. Better examples : $ cat z3.f90 program p real, parameter :: a = 1.0 data b /a%kind/ end $ cat z4.f90 program p integer, parameter :: a = 1 integer