https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87622
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87622
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Klein ---
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87622
>
> --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
> Some more remarks: In a benchmark, it is best to actua
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87622
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Klein ---
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> If "b" (and "a") are allocated in some slower memory part, it matters how one
> sums over the variables in the matmul loop.
I know that there are dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87622
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87622
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Some more remarks: In a benchmark, it is best to actually fill the values of
all read variables to something defined, for example with a call to
random_number. Also, if you generate values which you do not us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87622
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
