https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> here is the link:
>
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-fortran-compiler-for-linux-and-mac-os-x/topic/779807
What do you conclude from the posts?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
BTW do you expect the ambiguity to be resolved in the following test?
Module Mod_LL_DT
Implicit None
Private
Type, Public :: LLCont_DT
contains
Generic :: GetElement => GetElementByType,Ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
--- Comment #4 from Karl May ---
Hi. Thanks.
here is the link:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-fortran-compiler-for-linux-and-mac-os-x/topic/779807
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> From my understanding the compiler translates the generic call
> at compile time into calls for the functions bound to the generic call.
> If this is the case, and given the fact that the compiler di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
--- Comment #2 from Karl May ---
Hi.
Thank for the response
It compiles with
ifort -c -stand f08 tmp.f90
ifort -c -stand f15 tmp.f90
ifort -c -stand f03 tmp.f90
ifort version was 17.07
>From my understanding the compiler translates the gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
