https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85531
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 26, 2018 6:09:40 PM GMT+02:00, "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85531
>
>--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
>What is the best strategy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85531
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
What is the best strategy on this?
I assume the Fortran front end could do a dependency analysis,
the existing code could be extended for this.
We could then either do the scalarization in the front end, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85531
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85531
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Can you provide a testcase that can be compiled?
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here it is. The internal writes are there just to confuse the
optimizer.
module x
implicit none
contains
subrouti
