https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #9 from Seth Johnson ---
Thanks guys for the fast fix and review!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Mar 25 11:30:24 2018
New Revision: 258843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-25 Seth Johnson
Dominique d'Humieres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #5 from Seth Johnson ---
That looks perfect, thank you for looking into this.
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> Is the following patch OK?
>
>return false;
> }
>
> - if (!is_c_interoperable (fptr,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #3 from Seth Johnson ---
That's correct, because those standards include TS 29113 which allows arrays to
be referenced. `-std=f2008ts` also works. The problem is that the usage
described is valid Fortran 2003 but is marked otherwise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf ---
There is no error for -std=f2008ts or -std=2018.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #1 from Seth Johnson ---
- Correction in test case: `call dellocate(` should be replaced by
`deallocate(` (but this doesn't affect the behavior or test outcome
- Also note that the Fortran 2003 standard itself includes a structurally
10 matches
Mail list logo
