https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Feb 5 15:43:03 2017
New Revision: 245194
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245194&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #7 from ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
--- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Also the three remaining test failures are now understood as resulting from
an allocate (A, source = B), where A and B are allocatable arrays of a derived
type
with allocatable components, e.g. iso_varying_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter ---
>From the full test case I posted below, all the failing unit test and all but
three failing functional tests can be traced back to allocate (A, source = B)
problems. Three tests are not yet understood: smtes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Finally reduced this to something like 260 lines. Problem is the allocate
source construct, i.e. copying of allocatable derived type components.
module iso_varying_string
implicit none
integer, parame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Created attachment 40656
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40656&action=edit
Much reduced problem case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Created attachment 40654
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40654&action=edit
This test case now actually produces a segfault.
11 matches
Mail list logo