https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
--- Comment #5 from Michael Levy ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3)
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:37:52AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> A 3rd alternative is change your declaration in the subroutine to
>
> integer, exter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:37:52AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
>
> --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Your code looks bogus. If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
--- Comment #1 from Michael Levy ---
It looks like I accidentally attached the toy problem with the offending lines
commented out... uncomment lines 27 & 29 to create build issue. Sorry!
