https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 10 22:28:32 2016
New Revision: 243520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243520&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78226
* error.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Dec 6 13:41:46 2016
New Revision: 243300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-12-06 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi Andre,
the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00048.html
is OK (or, at your choice, obvious and simple).
I don't have access to my e-mail at the moment, so I cannot
reply to the list d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please ignore my previous unqualified comment. I had applied you patch on a git
branch and based my own in that, but failed to merge yours into mine. Doing so
immediately gave the errors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> It appears that the patch at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00040.html
>
> actually catches more errors than the original one.
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
It appears that the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00040.html
actually catches more errors than the original one.
So, more cases to find... Nice thing is, one
fix can fix quite a large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Current regressions with the patch at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00039.html :
>
> allocate_with_source_10.f08 allocate_with_source_11.f08
> ...
What are the failures? I have an ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Current regressions with the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00039.html :
allocate_with_source_10.f08 allocate_with_source_11.f08
allocate_with_source_13.f03 allocate_with_source_14.f03
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 7 19:33:27 2016
New Revision: 241927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241927&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78226
* expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's the commit, the PR number was incorrect.
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 7 15:25:21 2016
New Revision: 241909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-07 Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's a list of the currently failing test cases.
That doesn't look to bad, problems mostly seem to be
with SELECT TYPE and ALLOCATE.
llocate_class_3.f90
allocate_with_source_16.f90
alloc_comp_class_3.f03
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 6 21:27:32 2016
New Revision: 241887
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241887&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78226
resolve.c
16 matches
Mail list logo
