https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #10)
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:39:58PM +, physiker at toast2 dot net wrote:
> >
> > Ifort version 17 (linux) supports coarrays as selectors in an assoc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:39:58PM +, physiker at toast2 dot net wrote:
>
> Ifort version 17 (linux) supports coarrays as selectors in an associate
> construct:
> >ifort -o bug bug.f90 -warn all -check a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #9 from physiker at toast2 dot net ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #8)
> Hi Steve,
>
> you asked what other compilers have to say to the code (the one in the
> description).
>
> Ifort:
>
> > ifort bug.f90 -o bug -coarray
> bug.f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Steve,
you asked what other compilers have to say to the code (the one in the
description).
Ifort:
> ifort bug.f90 -o bug -coarray
bug.f90: catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:06:30PM +, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote:
>
> I had a meeting with Damian Rousan today and we briefly talked about
> OpenCoarrays. He has mentioned on the gfortran list ab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
On 11/01/2016 01:45 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
--- snip ---
> Fortunately, I use FreeBSD as my operating system, which
> unfortunately limits me to gfortran. I posted t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:32:46PM +, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > Someone needs to submit an interpretation request to J3.
>
>
> If you bypass the error for associate names, does such code ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
I believe the posted code is neither conforming nor nonconforming.
It has found a defect in the Fortran 2008 standard. The code can
be written as
subroutine co_assoc
implicit none
integer, parameter :: p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
12 matches
Mail list logo
