https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Oct 23 18:12:28 2016
New Revision: 241451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/54730
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:19:36PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
>
> --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > The patch regtested fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The patch regtested fine but for
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 16)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
I have overlooked another fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Patch posted at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-10/msg00156.html
The patch regtested fine but for
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/udr3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
>
> I may have a patch for this bug, and boy is it a REAL pain.
>
Patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-10/msg00156.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
I may have a patch for this bug, and boy is it a REAL pain.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:17:34AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
>
> --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr71759. I don't see the ICE with compilers configured
with --enable-checking=release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Reduced testcase.
>
> function f(n, x)
>integer, intent(in) :: n
>complex, intent(in) :: x(1:n)
>real :: f
>f = g([real(x(1:n)), aimag(x(1:n))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78033
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
13 matches
Mail list logo