https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #12 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Dominique,
I was intending to backport to 6-branch but wanted to be sure that no
nasties come out of the woodwork on trunk.
Best regards
Paul
PS Will be back in France late toni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #11 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 23 18:09:14 2016
New Revision: 241450
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241450&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/69834
* class.c (gfc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > > Created attachment 37791 [details]
> > > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&action=edit
> > > Better Patch
> >
> > With the patch applied to my working tree (many patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 37791 [details]
> > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&action=edit
> > Better Patch
>
> Withe patch applied to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
Hi Dominique,
I do not know what is going on here.
> > Created attachment 37791 [details]
> > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&act
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 37791
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&action=edit
> Better Patch
Withe patch applied to my working tree (many patches) fixes the PR but I see
several
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 37791
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&action=edit
Better Patch
I couldn't persuade the last patch to work on submodule_6.f08. Evidently,
submodules wind up with th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #2 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Thanks Thomas! Sorry that I missed your PR.
I wonder what, if anything, we should do about it?
Cheers
Paul
On 16 February 2016 at 11:54, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https:/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
12 matches
Mail list logo