https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
--- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf ---
Updated patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00189.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Nick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
--- Comment #8 from Nick ---
That is much more informative.
However, how are gcc policies on progressive errors?
I mean the later errors are due to this non-scalar counter. Should they be
silenced in that case?
In any case I think this is much
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > I think it should be clearer from the error message of _what is wrong_?
>
> Agreed -> Updated the summary, set to NEW and enhancement.
A potential patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
Summary|forall arr
