https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:29:57PM +, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
>
> --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele ethz.ch> ---
> (In reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)
>
> I would urge anyone trying to be clever to use clear syntax:
>
https://github.com/hfp/libxsmm/commit/cc308fc5debe6151157a4fa9efacc7aa03351283
is what we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:20:59AM +, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
wrote:
> I believe there was some confusion about the second testcase.
> The real question
> is if this is valid in all cases:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
