https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's keep this open to see if any platform develops a regression
with the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:51:16 2018
New Revision: 257605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68746
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:48:32 2018
New Revision: 257604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68746
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-01-31 3:17 AM, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is there anything than can be done to debug this?
> What happens if you compile the test with -g and
> run it under a debgger?
It's not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-01-26 8:57 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
>
> --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2018-01-26 8:29 PM, do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-01-26 8:29 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> By the xfail? Can the PR be closed?
I'll have to investigate...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I don't have a recent gcc-6 set of test results but the bug is fixed in
> gcc-7 and gcc-8.
By the xfail? Can the PR be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I don't have a recent gcc-6 set of test results but the bug is fixed in
gcc-7 and gcc-8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Test fails on hpux because ios has the value 0 after following read:
read(10, iostat=ios) c
It would pass if check was:
if ((ios.ne.21).and.(ios.ne.0)) then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Feb 14 16:29:08 2016
New Revision: 233412
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233412&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/68746
* gfortran.dg/read_dir.f90: Xfail o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux*
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Looks like but this one is hard to debug with gdb.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo
