[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-25 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:15:04AM +, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything. > > FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The > > issue with EXPR_

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-25 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:48:19PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 > > --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Not sure how the gcc/test

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Not sure how the gcc/testsuite got on the end. Oh well, the > testcase won't hurt anything. [Book15] f90/bug% gfca /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsui

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:07:44PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 > > --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Added: > > trunk/gcc/

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Added: > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 Is it intended?

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Unreopen.

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Nov 24 18:58:28 2015 New Revision: 230832 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230832&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-24 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68486

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This one fails for me with -O2 ... You don't need any optimization to reproduce. The ICE comes from the nested CSHIFT.

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:03:16PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- > 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 still fails: > Need an example the code causing the problem. I do

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #4 from kargl

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 22 19:41:20 2015 New Revision: 230726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230726&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-22 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68486

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2015-11-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 36804 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36804&action=edit Test showing the problem