https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Tue Oct 8 10:20:41 2019
New Revision: 276691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Extend 'libgfortran/runtime/minimal.c' per r274599 "PR fortran/6840
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #13 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Aug 17 05:45:37 2019
New Revision: 274599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/68401 Improve allocation error message
Improve the error messa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
How long this PR has to rot before being closed as WONTFIX?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #9 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #7)
> (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4)
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4)
> > > In the original post I suggested that I already looked a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4)
> > In the original post I suggested that I already looked at the code,
>
> What changes did you try?
Baby
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> I am still not convinced. IMO enhancements have only two realistic status:
> WONTFIX or ASSIGNED.
not sure, project that do not engage with their co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
15 matches
Mail list logo