https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Nov 9 06:06:52 2015
New Revision: 229993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-08 Steven g. Kargl
PR fortran/68053
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Nov 9 05:50:24 2015
New Revision: 229992
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229992&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-08 Steven g. Kargl
PR fortran/68053
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Accepted and correct, if scalar parameter n is used instead :
$ cat z1s.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = -1
integer, parameter :: x(1) = 7
integer, parameter :: z(n:*) = x
print *, z