[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-04-06 Thread jwmwalrus at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #11 from John --- Yes, -static does the trick when it comes to the namelist ---although, in the actual program, I get an obscure error when I try to invoke C's execv/waitpid. Thanks a lot for the help provided, and sorry for the inco

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-04-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- For the record, my results with trunk: $ gfc pr65541.f90 $ ./a.out $ cat some.dat &SOME A%T2%T1%I= 0, A%T2%J= 0, A%K= 0, /

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-04-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to John from comment #8) > Hi, > > It seems that some testing was required after all. With the latest gcc > snapshot from Debian (20150329-1) I still get the same output from the test > code: > F

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-04-01 Thread jwmwalrus at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #8 from John --- Hi, It seems that some testing was required after all. With the latest gcc snapshot from Debian (20150329-1) I still get the same output from the test code: $ ll `which gfortran-5.0 ` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 35 Feb

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-03-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-03-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Mar 26 02:44:34 2015 New Revision: 221682 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221682&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-25 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/65541 * io/write.c

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-03-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This fixes it: ... Confimed (the patch in comment 4 does not apply cleanly and needs some minor surgery) and it regtest without regression. Thanks for quick fix.

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-03-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- This fixes it: Index: io/write.c === --- io/write.c(revision 221571) +++ io/write.c(working copy) @@ -1704,10 +1704,11 @@ size_t cle

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-03-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

2015-03-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED