https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Jun 9 20:10:34 2018
New Revision: 261375
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261375&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-09 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/63514
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Jun 9 18:02:56 2018
New Revision: 261368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261368&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-09 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/63514
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Jun 9 15:33:28 2018
New Revision: 261360
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261360&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-09 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/63514
* symbol.c (gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 03:40:40AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> There is, however, a bug with respect to F2018:
>
> C1588 A local variable of a pure subprogram, or of a BLOCK construct
> within a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The fortran frontend must do sth wrong here - it seems to mark the function
> pure itself and either fold or the FE even does the optimization (look at
> t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
