subject:"\[Bug fortran\/61234\] Warn for use\-stmt without explicit only\-list."

[Bug fortran/61234] Warn for use-stmt without explicit only-list.

2014-08-22 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61234 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61234] Warn for use-stmt without explicit only-list.

2014-08-22 Thread vondele at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61234 --- Comment #6 from vondele at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vondele Date: Fri Aug 22 10:14:50 2014 New Revision: 214311 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214311&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-22 Joost VandeVondele * gfortran.dg/use_wi

[Bug fortran/61234] Warn for use-stmt without explicit only-list.

2014-05-30 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61234 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fort

[Bug fortran/61234] Warn for use-stmt without explicit only-list.

2014-05-20 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61234 --- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #3) > Obviously, this only works as long as the code is still compilable by g95 ... which in our project started to require so many workarounds that : http://so