[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

2016-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

2016-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 17:22:02 2016 New Revision: 242009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242009&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Steve Kargl Janus Weil PR fo

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

2016-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think the patch in comment 1 actually does not work as expected (due to a spurious semicolon). However, this variant seems to work well and regtests cleanly: Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c =

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

2016-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

2016-11-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

2016-11-08 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid