[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2015-05-16 Thread a.vogt at fulguritus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 Alexander Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2015-05-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-05-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.10.0, 4.9.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-14 Thread a.vogt at fulguritus dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Vogt --- Thanks a lot!

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-14 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin --- Fixed on trunk.

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-14 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin --- Author: mikael Date: Fri Mar 14 21:28:59 2014 New Revision: 208581 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208581&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fortran/ PR fortran/60392 * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_pa

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-07 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5) > This removes the difference between my_mul/my_mul_cont. > However this is not yet correct, with the patch the program output is: > Maybe it's correct after all. It'

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-07 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin --- Created attachment 32307 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32307&action=edit preliminary patch This removes the difference between my_mul/my_mul_cont. However this is not yet correct, with th

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-05 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #3) > So we pass the transposed array with > transposed bounds -> we pass the original array. Not exactly in fact: In my_mul_cont, a.stride[0] == 2 and a.stride[1] == 1.

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-05 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-03 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug fortran/60392] Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments

2014-03-02 Thread a.vogt at fulguritus dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Vogt --- Created attachment 32243 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32243&action=edit Sample code