[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2016-12-08 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2016-12-07 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2015-04-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I am confused by the comments 5 to 7, probably because my comment 4 was confusing. What I have tested is 4.8.5 with the patch for fortran/trans-expr.c plus the additional tests diff -upN ../4.8_clean

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2015-04-11 Thread drikosev at otenet dot gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Comment #7 from drikosev at otenet dot gr --- The option of omitting the trailing underscore (-fno-underscoring) is explained at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Code-Gen-Options.html In the above link, there is also a wish (hope) that

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2015-04-11 Thread drikosev at otenet dot gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Comment #6 from drikosev at otenet dot gr --- On Apr 11, 2015, at 3:30 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > For the test case you should have a look at > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HowToPrepareATestcase, in particular to the section { > dg-d

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2015-04-11 Thread drikosev at otenet dot gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Comment #5 from drikosev at otenet dot gr --- On Apr 11, 2015, at 3:30 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > For the test case you should have a look at > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HowToPrepareATestcase, in particular to the section { > dg-d

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2015-04-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The above patch is quite small and perhaps solves the problem in branch 4-8. > I've coded it before I read the code convention rules for patches. > In case the patch indeed solves the problem, we'll

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2015-04-10 Thread drikosev at otenet dot gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 drikosev at otenet dot gr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at otenet dot gr ---

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2014-02-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2014-02-01 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code