https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #7)
> Hopefully this PR is finally back in the correct state.
I think so. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
--- Comment #7 from Damian Rouson ---
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 12:45 AM, janus at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #4)
>> I meant to mark a different PR as inva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #4)
> I meant to mark a different PR as invalid but marked this one mistakenly.
Which one? So, should we reopen this one?
> Now I just tried to reset its s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
I meant to mark a different PR as invalid but marked this one mistakenly. Now
I just tried to reset its status duplicate and got the following message:
"You cannot mark bug 59694 as a duplicate of bug 67472
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
--- Comment #3 from Ian Harvey ---
Why has this been marked as invalid?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
Ian Harvey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
--- Comment #
