http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #13 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com ---
You are right! Thanks a lot.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to klaas_giesbertz from comment #11)
> Finally figured out how to make it work. I guess this is what the class(*)
> is useful for. Using class(*) I can simply overload Func and its resolut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #11 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com ---
Finally figured out how to make it work. I guess this is what the class(*) is
useful for. Using class(*) I can simply overload Func and its resolution
becomes dynamic. I consider the class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> When I say 4.7.3 it means the 4.7.3 release, otherwise I give the revision
> number or the date if the former is not available.
Ok, that matches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
When I say 4.7.3 it means the 4.7.3 release, otherwise I give the revision
number or the date if the former is not available.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #7)
> Some commit on the 4.7
> branch might have affected the behavior?
After a quick look into the ChangeLog, I already have a suspicion:
2013-06-01 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> The test in comment 0 compiles with 4.7.3 and gives at run time
Is this with the proper 4.7.3 release or some 4.7 branch build? Can you give
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to klaas_giesbertz from comment #4)
> I have copied it back from my post and it still compiles with my
> gfortran4.7.3. Could it have something to do with my build of gcc?
Hopefully not, b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #4 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com ---
In reply to Comment2&3 (Janus):
I have copied it back from my post and it still compiles with my gfortran4.7.3.
Could it have something to do with my build of gcc? I used macports to insta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to klaas_giesbertz from comment #0)
> This code compiles both with gcc4.7.3 and gcc4.8.2 and gives in both cases
> the incorrect output:
> Base Func called
> It should have called the Deriv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #1 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com ---
Sorry, the 2nd argument of Init of UseBase in the 1st test should have been
target instead of pointer. In that case 'program Test' becomes the same as in
the 2nd test.
14 matches
Mail list logo
