https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:838999bb23303edc14e96b6034cd837fa4454cfd
commit r15-2187-g838999bb23303edc14e96b6034cd837fa4454cfd
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sun J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> Created attachment 58717 [details]
> Fix for the regression
>
> The mechanism in the original fix was OK but the use of the locus location
> was not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 58717
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58717&action=edit
Fix for the regression
The mechanism in the original fix was OK but the use of the locus location was
not. I wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #14)
> Seems to affect only dummies, not local arrays.
Comparing the dump tree between working and failing, the order of the
generation of the descriptors seems r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Further reduced:
program p
implicit none
integer, parameter :: nx = 64
real, dimension(nx) :: x, s, d, f
print *, shape (x), shape (s), shape (d), shape (f)
call sub (x,s,d,f)
contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong result with SIZE |15 Regression - Wrong
|s
