https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #7)
> Regtesting now ...
Completed successfully!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following patch fixes both variants (comment 1 and comment 5):
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c(rev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to janus from comment #5)
> However, it ICEs on the following variant (which involves a GENERIC TBP):
That test case compile with NAG f95 v5.1 (of 2007!) and with a pretty new Cray
ftn (version 8.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> (In reply to janus from comment #2)
> > Draft patch (not regtested yet):
>
> Seems to survive the regtest without any failures
However, it ICEs on the followin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
> Draft patch (not regtested yet):
Seems to survive the regtest without any failures (except for round_4.f90,
which is unrelated).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57966
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Statu
10 matches
Mail list logo
