https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Aug 10 14:08:53 2018
New Revision: 263471
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263471&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-08-10 Janus Weil
PR fortran/57160
* in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-07/msg00086.html
Don't abuse any optimization option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-07/msg00086.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #9)
> As noted already somewhere in the discussion of PR85599 on the mailing list,
> this breaks actual_pointer_function_1.f90 in the testsuite
... but apart from t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> > It is not actually a complete duplicate of PR 85599,
> > it is just similar.
>
> What is different?
Is "different chunks of code are required" good eno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> It is not actually a complete duplicate of PR 85599,
> it is just similar.
What is different?
IMO the two PRs should be closed as WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
15 matches
Mail list logo
