[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

2013-05-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

2013-05-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2013-05-07 10:00:20 UTC --- FIXED by the following commit (on the Fortran-dev branch). Thanks for the report! Author: burnus Date: Tue May 7 09:37:19 2013 New Revision: 198669 URL: http://gcc.g

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

2013-04-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-30 21:57:28 UTC --- For the test case in comment 0: __builtin_memset (y._data.base_addr, 0, 4); y._data.rank = 1; y._data.type = -1; y._data.dim[0].lower_bound = 1

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

2013-04-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

2013-04-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-01 21:34:55 UTC --- Created attachment 29769 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29769 Early draft patch The patch mostly implements a fix for this bug - but it needs some clean

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

2013-04-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-01 18:01:03 UTC --- The problem is in gfc_array_init_size. There, one should first obtain the element size. And instead of gfc_conv_descriptor_stride_set one should use gfc_conv_descriptor_sm_set.

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

2013-04-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-01 17:05:35 UTC --- The stride needs to be set from the source; it currently is taken from y (which is an empty type, hence the 0 for sm).