[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2013-08-08 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > It has been fixed between revisions 194721 and 195140. > > I can confirm that it is fixed on trunk, so le

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2013-08-08 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2013-06-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- It has been fixed between revisions 194721 and 195140.

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2013-06-11 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2012-10-25 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25 17:23:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Apparently it only handles expressions correctly, where the base symbol is > CLASS, but fails for those where it is TYPE. Sorry, I meant t

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2012-10-25 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2012-10-25 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25 14:51:44 UTC --- Here is a reduced test case, which is not usable as a runtime test, but shows the wrong dump: module m implicit none type :: t1 end type type :: t2

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2012-10-25 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25 11:58:15 UTC --- -fdump-tree-original shows that the correct code is generated for the call to "alt" in the main program (involving _vptr->_size): { struct __clas

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

2012-10-25 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code